33 . Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Additionally, the main objectives of your police is always to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and earlier mentioned all, assure regulation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The regulation enjoins the police being scrupulously fair towards the offender as well as the Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court along with from other Courts, However they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.

The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The plenty of this power casts an obligation to the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for just a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Read more

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI 46 SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have read the realized counsel with the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as the issues of the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard on the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(1) of the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession from the subjected premises to the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to be decided through the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer in the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court must see this part for interim custody of the topic premises In the event the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order.

Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, as well as the role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release like a legally regarded conviction. Read more

2299 of 2025. The findings are pending finalization and will be submitted without delay. Additionally they stated that directives for strict compliance have been issued to all Karachi models, with non-compliance dealing with departmental action. Furthermore, they submitted that an existing enquiry is underway. Therefore, These are directed to complete the proceedings and submit the enquiry report to this court through MIT-II of this Court. twelve. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Read more

As being the Supreme Court would be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has actually been reached, therefore the decision of the Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) of the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Cell Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 12 Justice in the Peace u/s 22-A is just not obliged to afford an opportunity of hearing into the accused party; nor obliged to necessarily or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is needed to contemplate all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid machinery of criminal regulation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are many of the relevant factors. Read more

S. Supreme Court. Generally speaking, proper case citation involves the names from the parties to the original case, the court in which the case was listened to, the date it was decided, plus the book in which it truly is recorded. Different citation requirements may include things like italicized or underlined text, and certain specific abbreviations.

Some bodies are given statutory powers to issue steerage with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, such as the Highway Code.

The regulation of necessity acknowledged and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it absolutely was the illegal action called law of necessity..

182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance from the respondents that pensionary benefits may be withheld on account of your allegations leveled against the petitioner, within our view, section twenty of the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does deliver for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension might be withheld or reduced. These include if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension could be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a significant crime, their pension could be withheld or reduced. In certain cases, a civil servant's pension might be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established by the government.

The reason for this difference is that these civil law jurisdictions adhere into a tradition that the reader should be able to deduce the logic from the decision along with the statutes.[four]

Where there are several members of the court deciding a case, there could possibly be one particular or more judgments provided (or reported). Only the reason for the decision with the majority can constitute a binding precedent, but all may be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning may very well be adopted in an argument.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming for the main case, it is also a properly-founded proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is topic to your procedure provided check here under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.